Report: Rams were going to trade for Mack

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
liny195 liny195
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Report: Rams were going to trade for Mack

 [url=http://www.sanfrancisco49ersteamonline.com/arik-armstead-jersey]http://www.sanfrancisco49ersteamonline.com/arik-armstead-jersey[/url] , trade him at the end of season The Los Angeles Rams notched their first win on Monday Night Football, beating the Oakland Raiders 33-13. The Raiders defensive front had issues andsorely missed recently traded pass-rusher Khalil Mack whom they dealt to the Chicago Bears for a couple draft picks. ESPN’s Adam Schefter reports the Rams were trying to get Mack as well and then trade him at the end of the season to recoup the draft picks. Several teams were interested in Mack’s services, the San Francisco 49ers included. It was obvious securing Mack wouldn’t be cheap in draft capitol and would get worse when contract numbers got discussed. The Rams still have players like Jared Goff to extend, which at least makes the thinking process understandable, but still crazy. It was already known the Rams tried to trade for Mack. The Raiders declined a trade offer from the Rams due to fears the Rams would, “pick too low.” IE; the Rams would have a good season and the first rounders the Raiders no doubt would have received would be used in the tail end of the round. The Rams have been spending money like crazy in anticipation of 2018. They extended Todd Gurley, traded for Brandin Cooks [url=http://www.sanfrancisco49ersteamonline.com/pierre-garcon-jersey]Authentic Pierre Garcon Jersey[/url] , and backed up the Brinks truck for Aaron Donald. Adding Mack into the mix, along with that contract he received from the Bears, easily could have put the Rams into future salary cap struggles. This might have been the only way to get him. So all of that for a one-year rental. And it’s quite an assumption the Rams could get their picks back on the huge contract they’d no doubt sign him to. They probably could, but it’s still a risk.The Rams already traded draft picks for Cooks and would be risking more of their future for Mack. Failure to get their investment back would hurt their future. On the other hand, if that trade went through and the Rams got Mack, only with the intention to trade him after 2018, this could have been the most expensive Super Bowl all-in ever seen. In any case [url=http://www.sanfrancisco49ersteamonline.com/dante-pettis-jersey]http://www.sanfrancisco49ersteamonline.com/dante-pettis-jersey[/url] , the Rams clearly lost this battle in the arms race. If Monday night is any indication, they definitely could have used Mack. The Rams, with Ndamukong Suh and Aaron Donald on the same line managed just one sack against the Raiders. Who knows what the addition of Mack could have brought. It’s good for 49ers fans at the very least. It’s safe to say most of us probably did not see a quarterback controversy emerging after Jimmy Garoppolo got hurt. Nobody is challenging Jimmy G for the starting spot, but the San Francisco 49ers now have a question about their starter for at least Week 10, if not the rest of the year.Nick Mullens got the Week 9 start after C.J. Beathard suffered wrist and thumb injuries in Week 8. After Beathard was unable to adequately grip a football much of the week, Kyle Shanahan decided to go with Nick Mullens against the Oakland Raiders. Beathard was active, but Mullens got the start after getting all the practice reps this week.Mullens had a fantastic evening [url=http://www.sanfrancisco49ersteamonline.com/earl-mitchell-jersey]http://www.sanfrancisco49ersteamonline.com/earl-mitchell-jersey[/url] , putting together arguably the greatest quarterback debut in recent memory. He finished the game completing 16 of 22 passes for 262 yards and three touchdowns. He had a couple inaccurate passes, but for the most part, everything went well for him and the 49ers managed their second win of the season.The question now is what happens in ten days when the 49ers host the New York Giants. After the game, head coach Kyle Shanahan said he has not thought about what’s next at the position, but that Mullens would certainly be part of the discussion for who starts in Week 10. The Raiders defense is atrocious, but Mullens deserves credit for executing the opportunity presented to him.Shanahan will chat with the media later on Friday, at which point he’ll get a chance to address the topic again. Then [url=http://www.sanfrancisco49ersteamonline.com/solomon-thomas-jersey]http://www.sanfrancisco49ersteamonline.com/solomon-thomas-jersey[/url] , the 49ers will get a few days off and return to practice early next week. At that point, we should get a better handle on things. Of course, Shanahan might play things close to the vest to prevent the Giants from preparing for just one quarterback.But how do you see it playing out in ten days when the 49ers and Giants take the field? Who will get the start between C.J. Beathard and Nick Mullens?